Video Camera Reviews: Isonic Snapbox HD665 vs RCA Small Wonder - True Comparison
Monday, December 29th, 2008
As you can see in the photo to the right, both the Isonic Snapbox HD665 and the RCA Small Wonder are about the same size - and both are the same size as the Flip Video models.
When I decided to buy a mini digital video camera earlier this year, I went with the RCA over the Flip for one feature: because the LCD screen flips both ways on the RCA Small Wonder, making it easier to frame a self-video. Happy as I’ve been with the RCA, I just bought the Isonic Snapbox camera so that I could shoot HD widescreen video.
I’m not so sure I’m impressed with the HD665…
What I’ve done is create two videos for you - one with my RCA Small Wonder, and the second with the new Isonic Snapbox HD665. To keep the comparison as clean as possible, I took both videos side by side in the same location, published them both using the same settings, and uploaded them both to YouTube:
Video 1 - RCA Small Wonder
Video 2 - Isonic Snapbox HD665
For a fair comparison click play on both videos and watch them at the same time. And of course it would be best to view each video on YouTube, and click the “watch in high quality” or “watch in HD” link just below the player on each. Here are the links to each video on YouTube:
Video 1 - RCA Small Wonder
Video 2 - Isonic Snapbox HD665
I love the idea of the Isonic Snapbox as it has tons of cool features - which I’m still figuring out as I go. For example, in addition to being a media player and voice recorder… you can hook it up to your laptop or PC and use it for live video conferencing or to send video emails.
That said, as I mentioned above - I’m not all that impressed with it just yet. The RCA Small Wonder is incredibly easy to use, while the Isonic Snapbox HD665 is a little more complicated. Or at least makes some assumptions about your video knowledge. As you can see here, I was feeling quite frustrated:
Frustrated from Lynn terry on Vimeo.
Smell my frustration there?
Blah. Of course, it helps if you’re not a complete video idiot -lol. And to be sure, I’ve had my moments… one of which I learned a great lesson from:
That explains the fuzzy quality of my Christmas video
Duh!
Minutes after I shot that nifty little video tip (heh), I shot this 2nd video with my handy-dandy RCA Small Wonder. Again you’ll notice the range is much broader with this cam:
Notice the difference in the size of the YouTube player on this video, compared to the two above? You have the option of embedding the 425 width, or the 480 width when posting the videos to your blog or on a website.
Even if your video is not widescreen, it will fill the 480 width player without any black space on either side - it just adjusts the height proportionately.
But if you are watching videos on YouTube, they automatically use the widescreen player. So any non-widescreen videos have the black spaces on the left and right of your video.
If this is the only real perk to the new camera, I dont know that it was worth the upgrade. I’m quite sure (in my case at least) that most people view my videos on my blog - unless I specifically link to them on YouTube (which is rare).
Honestly, how many people are going to click through to YouTube, and then click again to watch a video in HD or in high quality mode? Wouldnt you normally just click play and watch the video wherever you found it - ie embedded in a blog post or on a web page?
What about Video Quality?
Meh - I’m not seeing a dramatic improvement in quality. I’ve watched the video from the RCA Small Wonder, and the video from the Isonic Snapbox HD665 side by side - the first in high quality and the second in HD. I also watched them side by side with both videos in normal quality mode.
I do notice a slight improvement in video quality with the Isonic Snapbox camera… but nothing to write home about (in my opinion).
The color seems off on the Isonic Snapbox videos to me. A little green, maybe?? But there again, it could be something in the settings. Not something I’ve ever had to worry about with the RCA Small Wonder (just unbox & use!).
Also, the RCA Small Wonder has a flat bottom and will stand up on a flat surface on its own. The Isonic Snapbox has a rounded bottom and wont stand up on its own. Luckily my mini flex tripod fits both cameras, but its a pain to have to screw in the tripod for a quickie…
I’m thinking very seriously about returning the Isonic Snapbox HD665, and ordering an RCA EZ300HD Small Wonder instead, which is the HD version of my original RCA Small Wonder.
If I must go HD, that is. Keep in mind that we’re talking amateur mini video cameras here, for amateur use - obviously these models dont compare in quality to professional cameras.
I’d love to hear your thoughts. Is the Isonic Snapbox HD665 a crappy camera, or is all this HD talk just noise when it comes to amateur cameras? Do you really notice *that* big a difference?
I confess that I’m exhausted trying to learn the new camera (I’m a bit slow with those things, though) and worn out comparing the two… so I may be jumping the gun giving the Isonic Snapbox a less than glowing review. I could really use your input here.
Best,

p.s. Be sure to read the comments below for updates on this ongoing review, and subscribe to ClickNewz for future reviews & comparisons. You’ll also find reviews & product details on Amazon.com for each of the 3 products mentioned:
